All accepted full papers will be submitted for inclusion into IEEE Xplore subject to meeting IEEE Xplore's scope and quality requirements.
- Publication Ethics Statement
ICCSCT2025 follows the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible procedures against any publication misconduct. This Conference is committed to maintaining high standards through a rigorous peer-review together with strict ethical policies. Any infringements of professional ethical codes, such as plagiarism, fraudulent use of data, bogus claims of authorship, should be taken very seriously by the editors with zero tolerance.
The submitted manuscript should not have been previously published in any form and must not be currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.
Step 1. To keep scientific integrity, ICCSCT will run Turnitin on each new submission to see if has a problem with possible plagiarism. Papers not passing the plagiarism check will be desk rejected immediately.
Step 2. Then the publication chairs will have an initial check on the new submission to ensure it's within the scope of the conference and decide if it merits further review. If the new manuscript passed the initial check, it would be assigned to reviewers for double-blind peer review.
Step 3. Each selected paper will be reviewed by at least two/three independent experts with related research backgrounds mainly on originality, validity, quality, and readability.
Step 4. Review reports received from the experts will be judged by one of the TPC members with international scientific standards.
Step 5. If logical, then Review Reports will be sent to authors to modify the manuscript accordingly. If not logical, the TPC member can assign a new reviewer or judge on his/her own.
Step 6. Authors will be required to revise their papers according to the points raised.
Step 7. The revised manuscript will then be evaluated by the TPC to determine whether the points raised by the reviewers have been addressed or not.
Step 8. Then the TPC will send the revised manuscript to the reviewers again for re-evaluation.
Step 9. If the reviewers approve the revised version of the manuscript, then the TPC chair will make a final decision on acceptance for publication.
There are four possible decisions for a submitted full-paper
(1) Accepted with Official Acceptance Letter as a mail attachment to proceed with the registration.
(2) Minor/Major Revision. The papers should be revised according to reviewer comments to obtain the Official Acceptance Letter. Usually, one round of major revisions is allowed.
(3) Rejected. This means the paper will not be considered for the next process even if it is revised.
NOTE: Author should register to the conference only after obtaining the Official Acceptance Letter from the conference.
